Scandals are so widespread in current politics that it seems
the government is more worried about personal reputation than making laws. But
this isn’t a new phenomenon. Presidential campaigns have been mudslinging
whenever there is the slightest falter in decorum. And when all else is said
and done, politicians will often be remembered most for their scandals.
In 1884, America was enjoying the prosperity brought about
by the recent industrial revolution. Politics entered the Gilded Age, where
corruption was rampant and laws were made by and for big businesses (because
they were giving big money). The Republicans had held the White House since
Ulysses S. Grant’s terms with each simply following the policies set forth by
their predecessor. The election had two main candidates: Grover Cleveland for
the Democrats and James G. Blaine for the Republicans. The resulting campaigns
had nothing to do with politics.
Blaine tried to defame Cleveland by focusing on an alleged
affair. Maria Crofts Halpin claimed that Cleveland had fathered her child. This
rumor was further supported by the fact that Cleveland had paid child support
to her (Halpin had been with a few men. Cleveland, a bachelor, would suffer
less than if a married man had claimed the child.). This caused the Republicans
to jeer “Ma, Ma, where’s my Pa?”
Political Cartoon of "Ma, Ma, where's my Pa?" (courtesy of Wikimedia)
Cleveland fought back with “Blaine, Blaine, James G. Blaine, the continental liar from the state of Maine.” Blaine had been heavily involved with the railroad industry and owned chares in several companies. By using his influence as a politician, Blaine managed to profit off of his investments. Although these events occurred much earlier, new damning evidence had appeared. A particular letter sent by Blaine detailing some of his exploits had written at the bottom, “Burn this letter.” The Democrats seized the opportunity presented by this new evidence to seriously question the morals of Blaine. Engaging in underhanded business practices is one thing, but destroying evidence and claiming it never happened makes it much worse. To insult him further, many of the campaign cheers involved “Burn this letter” as a conclusion.
This election focused on attacking the rival’s character,
but the slogans provide some insight into their speakers. Blaine’s attack on
Cleveland found no immediate fault in his morals (Cleveland is considered to be
one of the best presidents in terms of character). As a result, Blaine took to
scandals. However, Cleveland openly responded with details about the incident
which in turn showed his honesty. On the other hand, Cleveland’s slogan against
Blaine helped to show his (Cleveland’s) take on corruption. In his past
positions in New York, he had proved to be a strong opponent to corruption.
Blaine’s attempts to defame Cleveland were not strong enough
to tarnish the Democrat’s reputation. Grover Cleveland went on to win the election, the only Democrat president in an era of Republicanism. His supporters, part in celebration and part in mockery, expanded upon the old taunt. “Ma, Ma, where’s my Pa? Gone to the White House. Ha! Ha! Ha!
This is the first topic that you've done that I wasn't familiar with, so I was very intrigued :)
ReplyDeleteI love how some elections devolved into jeers similar to things that one would expect to hear in middle schools. Not even presidents are exempt from these childish tactics I suppose. Gotta love a good scandal.
History is usually a very bland and factual topic, however, your comical twist on it makes the reading a whole lot more enjoyable. Scandalous info ! Ha! Ha!
ReplyDeleteThis is the first post that I've read and I love the style of your blog! Your tone is informative and professional, but not boring. I'm not a huge politics/history fan, so this presidential debate was definitely one I wasn't familiar with. The fact that presidential candidates resort to methods kids use in middle school is hilarious. I also love the inclusion of the political cartoon. Great job!
ReplyDeleteLike John mentioned, this is a much more esoteric bit of campaign history than some of your other blogs. That being said, I really enjoyed learning about the fiery campaign strategies employed by Blaine and Cleveland. I agree that while both utilized scandal, Cleveland (from your analysis) handled it much more effectively.
ReplyDelete